Saturday, May 19, 2012

What A Fraudster Really Steals


Patricia K. Smith, Controller for Baierl Acura Auto Dealership in Cranberry, Pennsylvania, thought she could “earn the love” of her family and friends and “see what happiness really looked like” when she decided to systematically begin stealing from her employer. During the next 6 ½ years, she misappropriated over $10 million – averaging almost $30,000 per week.

While her rationale for the theft may be used to question her sanity, the damage caused by fraud of this magnitude permeates throughout other industries as well. Small business owners and national corporate boards alike begin to think, “What if this is happening to us, right now, from one of our employees?” and “Can we trust our Accounting Department?” Businesses can and do regularly take reasonable steps to ensure fraud prevention, implementing simple internal controls such as separation of duties and forbidding the sharing of passwords. But the sting remains for management that one of their most trusted employees was able to commit these acts with controls in place. Now, their focus is keyed upon the new hires, and emphasizing that “it won’t happen again.” What the thief has really stolen is the trust management had in their subordinates.

Management of course does not come out and blatantly say, “We don’t trust you”, but they show it in other ways, such as micromanagement. Taking managing to an extreme, they are critical of all expenditures, down to the cost of paper clips and where the stock of paper clips has gone. Cash inflow is scrutinized to ensure it is deposited before supporting staff know it exists. This places an extra burden upon remaining employees and new hires, taking time from regular duties to satisfy the resulting paranoia. Productivity is reduced, and morale sinks to new lows. The actions of one whom has not worked there in months or years is still damaging the company, only to end when management can trust again – or valued employees begin to quit for a less overbearing environment.

Once the waves of turmoil have receded, the company is usually intact but the overall cost of mistrust has affected possibly dozens of lives, and the goodwill and experience the company had built over years are lost due to one person’s selfish actions. If you are a business owner and suspect fraud, contact a forensic accountant to investigate. The fee to determine a finding of non-fraud can be far less than the damage of suspicion or monetary loss.

(Credit for certain facts for this post: http://triblive.com/home/1549777-74/smith-leniency-million-judge-attorney-company-federal-herself-miller-baierl)